Top-down vs. Bottom-up Proteomics
Infographic
Published: November 28, 2018
|
Laura Elizabeth Lansdowne
Laura Lansdowne is the managing editor at Technology Networks, she holds a first-class honors degree in biology. Before her move into scientific editing, Laura worked at the Wellcome Sanger Institute and GW Pharma.
Learn about our editorial policies
&
Tiffany Quinn
Tiffany oversees the creation of custom content at Technology Networks and their sister publication, Analytical Cannabis. She holds a bachelor’s degree in neuroscience from the University of Leeds.
Learn about our editorial policies
Proteomics is an essential tool for the diagnosis, prognosis, and development of disease – since most diseases manifest at the protein activity level. In addition, it also plays a crucial role in drug discovery and development, helping to identify potential therapeutic targets.
The ’bottom-up’ approach has historically been the most commonly used workflow in proteomics, however, more recently the use of ‘top-down’ methods have begun to gain momentum.
Download this infographic to:
- Review both approaches
- Learn the main advantages and disadvantages of each approach
- Discover the applications each approach is best suited for
Meet the Authors
Managing Editor
Laura Lansdowne is the managing editor at Technology Networks, she holds a first-class honors degree in biology. Before her move into scientific editing, Laura worked at the Wellcome Sanger Institute and GW Pharma.
Custom Content Manager
Tiffany oversees the creation of custom content at Technology Networks and their sister publication, Analytical Cannabis. She holds a bachelor’s degree in neuroscience from the University of Leeds.
Advertisement